Plan your review.
Define your PICO question, draft a structured protocol, and record your eligibility criteria before you begin.
Search the literature, screen studies and analyse your findings. A shared workspace for your team, with AI assistance throughout the review.
Search your chosen databases
Store your protocol, studies, screening decisions and analysis in one project.
Your team checks AI suggestions against the original papers and approves the data, assessments and report.
Define your PICO question, draft a structured protocol, and record your eligibility criteria before you begin.
Search connected databases and bring records together. Identify duplicates using reference identifiers and title matching.
Check screening suggestions against your criteria and the original record. Resolve disagreements and record your decision.
Check extracted values against the original papers and review risk of bias for each result.
Analyse compatible, verified results. Inspect forest plots and heterogeneity, and review evidence certainty for each outcome.
Generate PRISMA flow diagrams and report drafts. Export review data, references, and figures for further review.
Adults with type 2 diabetes
GLP-1 receptor agonists
Placebo
HbA1c change at 24 weeks
GLP-1 receptor agonists versus placebo for HbA1c change in adults with type 2 diabetes
1 / 5
A systematic review is a process; a meta-analysis is an optional statistical step inside one. Learn when to pool, when not to, and how to read forest plots.
Read guideLearn how to read a forest plot: squares, whiskers, the pooled diamond, effect measures, weights, heterogeneity, prediction intervals, and common misreadings.
Read guideHow AI-assisted abstract screening works in systematic reviews, where it fails, and how to combine it with human adjudication and transparent reporting.
Read guideAutoEvidence is a workspace for systematic reviews and meta-analyses. It brings together your research question, search, screening, data extraction, analysis, and reporting, with AI assistance and researcher oversight.
AI can assist with protocol drafts, abstract screening, data extraction, and assessments. You can compare screening decisions and review disagreements. AI output still needs your assessment, and you remain responsible for the review's scientific decisions.
The available sources are PubMed, Europe PMC, OpenAlex, CrossRef, ClinicalTrials.gov, Semantic Scholar, and DOAJ. PubMed is the base search, and you can select additional sources. Coverage and availability depend on each source.
AutoEvidence provides structured protocol drafts, tracks screening decisions and exclusion reasons, and generates PRISMA 2020 flow diagrams and report drafts. Review completeness and check the content against your methods and original sources before using it in a manuscript.
Yes. The platform includes fixed-effects and random-effects models, forest plots, funnel plots, and heterogeneity statistics. Pooling requires at least two compatible studies with verified, approved inputs. Your team decides whether the studies and methods are suitable for the question.
Download review data as JSON or CSV, references as RIS or BibTeX, and diagrams as SVG. These exports support further checking and work in your reference manager or manuscript.
Have another question? Get in touch
Bring your research question.
Set up a project and draft your protocol.